CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RİP VAN WİNKLE BY WASHINGTON IRVING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20798104

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Power, National Identity, American Society, Rip Van Winkle, Washington Irving

Abstract

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is an interdisciplinary method focused on analyzing ideologies and power dynamics, whether explicit or implicit, within discourses. Its interdisciplinary nature stems from its collaboration with fields such as Rhetoric, Text linguistics, Anthropology, Philosophy, Socio-Psychology, Cognitive Science, Literary Studies and Sociolinguistics, as well as Applied Linguistics and Pragmatics. It is a method used in the analysis of both written and spoken discourses. It enables the identification of social inequalities, power abuse, and ideological elements that emerge in discourse. It is also used to make sense of social media, advertising, or politics discourses based on how the manipulations that occur through discourse in daily life shape individuals or societies. Washington Irving’s Rip Van Winkle that is the subject of the study, is considered one of the first works of American literature. Based on the premise that discourses only reveal their true meaning when considered within the context in which they are produced, this work, written in 1819, requires evaluation within its historical context. While Irving’s work was once interpreted as a legendary escape from history, it is now considered an important part of American history. This study aims to examine Rip Van Winkle narrative within the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, to shed light on issues such as the socio-political structure of the period and the balances of power in its historical background, while also reaching historical information about America at the time.

References

van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466-485). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bowen, E. W. (1906). Washington Irving’s Place in American Literature. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 14(2), 171-183.

Ferguson, R. A. (2005). Rip Van Winkle and the Generational Divide in American Culture. Early American Literature, 40(3), 529-544.

Grant, S. M. (2012). A concise History of United States of America. Cambridge University Press.

Irving, W. (1988). Rip Van Winkle. Penguin Books.

Maika, D. J., Meuwese, M., Mosterman, A. C., Romney, S. S., Noorlander, D. L., Cantwell, A. M., & Wall, Z. d. (2014). Roundtable: The Past, Present and Future of New Netherland Studies. New York History, 95(3), 446-490.

Mengeling, M. E. (1964). Characterization in “Rip Van Winkle”. The English Journal, 53(9), 643-646.

Rip Van Winkle's Return. (1879). The Aldine-The Art Journal Of America, 9(12), 374-377.

Staley, G. A. (2012). Rip Van Winkle's “Odyssey”. Greece & Rome, 59(1), 90-103.

Şah, U. (2020). Eleştirel Söylem Analizi: Temel Yaklaşımlar. Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(7), 210-231.

Torusdağ, G. (2018). Textlinguistic Analysis of the Short Stories and Language Teaching, Sample of Eveline By Joyce. Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları, 18(18), 127-167.

Torusdağ, G. (2023). Critical Analysis on Advertising Discourses. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(291), 285-292.

van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and Discourse A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Pompeu Fabra University, 1-118.

Vanspanckeren, K. (1994). Outline of American Literature. United States Department of State.

Young, P. (1960). Fallen from Time: The Mythic Rip Van Winkle. The Kenyon Review, 22(4), 547-573.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-24

How to Cite

YÖRÜK, K., & TORUSDAĞ, G. (2026). CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RİP VAN WİNKLE BY WASHINGTON IRVING. NEW ERA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY SOCIAL RESEARCHES, 11(34), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20798104