GASTRONOMIC HUBS AS URBAN CATALYSTS; A RESEARCH-BASED DESIGN APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22123745

Keywords:

Food-Focused Community Center, Architectural Typology, Urban Permeability, Modularity, Programmatic Hybridization.

Abstract

This study presents the "Food-Focused Community Center" model as an architectural alternative and an urban catalyst to the traditional shopping center (mall) typology, which often persists as an isolated, introverted "closed box" within the modern urban pattern. The disconnection between commercial spaces, social interaction, and local production in contemporary cities is identified as a fundamental problem. The research investigates the potential of transforming introverted commercial environments into public focal points that repair urban disruptions when a food-oriented program is structured through the criteria of permeability, modularity, and programmatic hybridization. A "Research-Based Design" methodology was adopted, where an experimental laboratory setting utilized capstone design outcomes as empirical typological datasets. Within the scope of a Case Study focused on the dense residential pattern along the Fevzi Çakmak Street corridor in Avcılar Ambarlı-directly complementing the adjacent historic Köyiçi core-ten design prototypes (Pr 1–Pr 10) were evaluated across four fundamental parameters: Permeability, Mass and Tectonics, Modularity, and Programmatic Hybridization. Supported by comparative ground-floor plan layouts and tectonic section diagrams, the findings indicate that micro-plazas and level-access entrances designed as direct extensions of the street effectively ensure urban continuity. Furthermore, rational gridal systems provide high spatial adaptation capability, while the integration of production workshops and market functions renders local craftsmanship visible, transforming standard commercial volumes into active community hubs. As a result, the proposed model serves as an urban catalyst and a "Sustainable Urban Metabolism" prototype that supports local production cycles and social interaction through multi-scalar transitions. In the context of contemporary "de-malling" discussions in the literature, the study offers a robust methodological framework for reconfiguring introverted commercial structures into public generators. Future research is suggested to focus on the typological transformations of these architectural models across varying urban morphologies and their tectonic integration with digital fabrication technologies.

References

Atmaca, M. (2023). Re-functioning of a dead shopping mall as a university. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 16(1), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1190753

Aydin, N., Seker, S., & Özkan, B. (2022). Planning location of mobility hub for sustainable urban mobility. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81, 103843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103843

Bazazzadeh, H., Nadolny, A., Mehan, A., & Hashemi Safaei, S. S. (2021). The importance of flexibility in adaptive reuse of industrial heritage: Learning from Iranian cases. International Journal of Conservation Science, 12(1), 113-128. https://philarchive.org/rec/BAZTIO-6

Bianco, L. (2024). Adaptive re-use of historic covered markets: A review of selected cases in European capital cities. Heritage, 6(2), 1089-1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6020060

Borysenko, A. S. (2025a). Modern transformation of spatial typology of shopping centers. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2025-0001

Borysenko, A. S. (2025b). Principles of the formation of architectural environment of a modern shopping center focused on non-commercial attractive qualities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1499, 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1499/1/012003

Castel Branco, R., & da Costa, A. R. (2024). From maximum urban porosity to city's disaggregation: Evidence from the Portuguese case. Cities, 148, 104836, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104836

Cervero, R., Guerra, E., Al, S. (2017). Transit-oriented development. In: Beyond mobility. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-835-0_7

Chiodelli, F., & Moroni, S. (2015). Do malls contribute to the privatisation of public space and the erosion of the public sphere? Reconsidering the role of shopping centres. City, Culture and Society, 6(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2014.12.002

Christiaanse, K., & Jabłońska, J. (2022). The diversity and porosity in urban design – works by Kees Christiaanse. Architectus, 3(71), 105-114. DOI: 10.37190/arc220311

Corbo, S. (2026). How do we know in design? Exploring knowledge and inquiry in architectural design. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 50(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2026.24623

Crawford, M. (1992). The world in a shopping mall. M. Sorkin (Ed.), Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space içinde (pp. 3-30). Hill and Wang.

De Gregorio, S., De Vita, M., & Paris, A. (2023). Industrial heritage rethinking: Flexibility design for eco-friendly environments. Buildings, 13(4), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041048

Erdoğan, E., Yıldız, Z., & Erdoğan, H. A. (2023). User perceptions of shopping centres with different spatial configurations. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.239%20

Fahlbusch, J., Fischer, F., Gegner, M., Grahle, A., & Tasche, L. (2025). Towards a concept for a multifunctional mobility hub: Combining multimodal services, urban logistics, and energy. Logistics, 9(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9030092

Favargiotti, S., Zantedeschi, G., Pianegonda, A., Brunelli, M., & Urbani, M. (2024). Designing food hubs for territories of proximity: Assessing the spatial, ecological, and cultural potentials of places through multi-criteria decision support systems. Land, 13(8), 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081131

Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2. Edition). John Wiley & Sons.

Guimarães, P. (2019). Exploring the impacts of gentrified traditional retail markets in Lisbon in local neighbourhoods. Social Sciences, 8(6), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8060190

Hauberg, J. (2011). Research by design – a research strategy. Revista Lusófona de Arquitectura e Educação, (5), 46-56. http://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/revlae/issue/current

Hein, C. (2021). Port city porosity: Boundaries, flows, and territories. Urban Planning, 6(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4663

Jiao, Z., Zhang, J., & Ou, L. (2025). Revitalization and utilization of industrial architectural heritage based on spatial organization and pedestrian flow nodes. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-07078-3

Koolhaas, R. (2001). Junkspace. Chung, C. J., Inaba, J., Koolhaas, R. ve S. T. Leong (Ed.), In: Project on the city II: The Harvard Design School guide to shopping. Taschen.

Öztürk, G. B. (2025). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage: Eskişehir haller youth center. TUBA-KED, Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Cultural Inventory, 32, 277-293. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tubaked/article/1635805

Mazzetto, S., Furlan, R., & Hoblos, J. (2025). Transit-oriented development and urban livability in gulf cities: Comparative analysis of Doha's west bay and Riyadh's King Abdullah financial district. Sustainability, 17(18), 8278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188278

Mısırlısoy, D. (2021). Towards Sustainable Adaptive Reuse of Traditional Marketplaces. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 12(2), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2020.1784671

Reinoso Bellido, R., Campos-Sánchez, F. S., & Abarca-Álvarez, F. J. (2021). Porosity and fragmentation of the block in the city core: a Nolli’s innovation perspective. Journal of Maps, 17(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1891581

Roggema, R. (2017). Research by design: Proposition for a methodological approach. Urban Science, 1(1), 2, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1010002

Salat, S., & Ollivier, G. (2017). Transforming the urban space through transit-oriented development: The 3V approach. World Bank Group. Washington, DC.

Schuetz, J., Kolko, J., ve Meltzer, R. (2012). Are poor neighborhoods “retail deserts”?. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1-2), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.09.005

Seçer Kariptaş, F., & Kariptaş, F. (2024). Re-functioning of industrial buildings within the framework of industrial heritage concept. New Era International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Researches, 9(26), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14553401

Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. Hill and Wang.

Steigemann, A. (2019). The places where community is practiced: How store owners and their businesses build neighborhood social life. Springer VS Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25393-6

Taşkın Erten, Ö. (2011). Questioning the privatization of public space: The "publicness" of shopping centers. Ph.D. Thesis, Izmir Institute of Technology, İzmir.

Yildirim, S. G., & Ciritci, İ. (2025). Adaptive reuse of historical buildings through cultural heritage conservation; the warehouse of Sirkeci train station. New Design Ideas, 9(2), 342-363. https://doi.org/10.62476/ndi.92342

Yiwei, O., & Manfredini, M. (2022). The configurational analysis of the ultra-modern shopping centre in the urban restructuring of the mediatised era; A study of ultra-modern centre based on the method of space syntax. Proceedings of the 13th Space Syntax Symposium, Bergen, Norway.

White, J. T., Orr, A., Jackson, C., Gardner, A., Hickie, J., Richardson, R., & Stewart, J. (2025). Averting dead mall syndrome: De-malling and the future of the purpose-built shopping center in large UK cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 47(5), 1523-1539. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2239957

WSP (2025, March 19). Transit-oriented communities advance sustainable cities. WSP Global Inc. Retrieved on December 10, 2025, from https://www.wsp.com/en-gl/insights/transit-oriented-communities-advance-sustainable-cities

Weilacher, U. (2018). Porosity as a structural principle of urban landscapes. In S. Wolfrum (Ed.), Porous City: From Metaphor to Urban Agenda (pp. 230-234). Basel: Birkhäuser.

Yıldırım, S. G. (2025). Urban and architectural design approaches in the spatial regeneration of Ambarlı Köyiçi. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, 11(44), 43-73. https://doi.org/10.29228/kesit.86787

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

YILDIRIM, S. (2026). GASTRONOMIC HUBS AS URBAN CATALYSTS; A RESEARCH-BASED DESIGN APPROACH . NEW ERA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY SOCIAL RESEARCHES, 11(35), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22123745