LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS FOR AN AGING POPULATION: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
Abstract views: 11
/ 
PDF downloads: 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15737009Keywords:
Yaşlanan Nüfus, Bakım Hizmetleri, Ekonomik Sürdürülebilirlik, Yaş Dostu KentlerAbstract
The 21st century is witnessing a rapidly aging population structure on a global scale, along with the increasing life The 21st century is witnessing a rapidly aging population structure on a global scale, along with the increasing life expectancy and decreasing fertility rates. As an inevitable result of this demographic change and transformation, it creates significant deep impacts on health and social service systems. This process, shaped by the increase in longevity and decreasing fertility rates, necessitates the re-evaluation of sustainable development policies. Therefore, it is very important to effectively implement long-term services and support mechanisms to increase the quality of life of elderly individuals by preserving their independence. This study addresses strategies to develop sustainable and accessible long-term care services for the aging population and draws attention to the importance of what can be done in this regard. The study examines basic components such as institutional services for elderly care, home care, community-based supports and the integration of technological innovations. In addition, important issues such as the financial sustainability of services, training of care personnel and the implementation of multidisciplinary approaches are discussed. In addition, applicable strategies are suggested for countries with aging populations such as Türkiye. In order for long-term services to be implemented effectively, policy makers, health and social service providers and all stakeholders in society need to work in collaboration. Developing integrated and inclusive service models that are sensitive to the needs of older individuals will make the aging process healthier and more sustainable both at the individual and societal levels.
References
AARP. (2017). AARP Policy Book: Aging in Place.
Akyıldız, N.A. ve Akbaş, E. (2020). Yaş dostu kent kriterlerinin kentsel morfolojiyi biçimlendirmesi. Sosyal Çalışma Dergisi, 4, (2), 84-90.
Baxter, K., & Glendinning, C. (2012). The role of informal care in long-term care. Social Policy & Society, 11(1), 5-16.
Bloom, D. E., Chatterji, S., Kowal, P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., McKee, M., Rechel, B., & Smith, J. P. (2011). Population ageing: the future of global economic and social implications. The Lancet, 378(9797), 1339-1346.
Bowers, B. J., Fibich, B., & Jacobson, N. (2001). Care-as-service, care-as-relating, care-as-comfort: Understanding nursing home residents' definitions of quality. The Gerontologist, 41(4), 539-545.
Brooker, D. (2004). What is person-centred care in dementia? Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 13(3), 215-222.
Butrica, J. A., Johnson, R. W., & Zedlewski, S. R. (2009). Volunteer dynamics of older Americans. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(5), 644-655.
Chappell, N. L., & Funk, L. (2011). Social support, caregiving, and aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 355-370.
Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2001). Nonpharmacologic interventions for inappropriate behaviors in dementia: A review, summary, and critique. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 9(4), 361-381.
Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. OECD Health Policy Studies. OECD Publishing.
Danış, M. Z. (2005). “Toplum Temelli Bakım Anlayışı”, Öz-Veri Dergisi, T. C. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Yayını, 21 (2): 445-459.
Edvardsson, D., Winblad, B., & Sandman, P. O. (2008). Person-centred care of people with severe Alzheimer’s disease: Current status and ways forward. The Lancet Neurology, 8(4), 317-327.
European Commission. (2020). The 2020 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2019–2070).
Fazio, S., Pace, D., Flinner, J., & Kallmyer, B. (2018). The fundamentals of person-centered care for individuals with dementia. The Gerontologist, 58(suppl_1), S10-S19.
Forder, J., & Fernandez, J.-L. (2011). Length of stay in care homes. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
Gallagher, A., Li, S., Wainwright, P., Jones, I. R., & Lee, D. (2008). Dignity in the care of older people – A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BMC Nursing, 7(11), 1-12.
Genet, N., Boerma, W., Kroneman, M., Hutchinson, A., & Saltman, R. B. (Eds.). (2011). Home care across Europe: Current structure and future challenges. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Glasby, J., & Dickinson, H. (2014). Partnership working in health and social care: What is integrated care and how can we deliver it? Policy Press.
Humpert, K. (1997). Einführung in den Städtebau. Kohlhammer Architekture. Stuttgart.
Keating, L., & Eales, J. (2017). Social consequences of family caregiving: Implications for caregiver support and health promotion. Ageing and Society, 37(6), 1037-1058.
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Open University Press.
Kontos, P. (2005). Embodied selfhood in Alzheimer’s disease: Rethinking person-centred care. Dementia, 4(4), 553-570.
Kurtkapan, H. (2018). Aktif yaşlılık ve yerel yönetim uygulamaları: İstanbul örneği. Yaşlılık Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2, 38-52.
Lain, D. (2012). Working past 65 in the UK and the USA: Segregation into 'Lopaq' occupations? Work, Employment and Society, 26(1), 78-94.
Lefebvre, H. (1974). The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, Blackwell Publishing, USA.
Marshall, M. (2011). Developing supportive design for people with dementia. Health Design & Technology Institute.
McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (2010). Person-centred nursing: Theory and practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
McCormack, B., Dewing, J., & McCance, T. (2011). Developing person-centred care: Addressing contextual challenges through practice development. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(2), 3.
OECD. (2021). Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Pew Research Center. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Pew Research Center.
Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 733-739.
Ranci, C., & Pavolini, E. (Eds.). (2013). Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe: Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts. Springer.
Schulz, R. (2000). Handbook on dementia caregiving: Evidence-based interventions for family caregivers. Springer.
Taşcı, F. (2010). Yaşlılara yönelik sosyal politikalar: İsveç, Almanya, İngiltere ve İtalya örnekleri. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1, 175-202.
Topol, E. (2015). The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine is in Your Hands. Basic Books.
Tutal, O. ve Üstün, B. (2009). Yaşlılık ve yaş dostu kentler: Eskişehir. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 1, 1-23.
United Nations. (2019). World Population Ageing 2019: Highlights. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121-139.
Weiss, D., Westerhof, G. J., & Bode, C. (2018). Cognitive aging and well-being in adulthood: The role of subjective aging. American Psychologist, 73(2), 176-187.
World Health Organization (2007). Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide Web: https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf Erişim tarihi: 04.03.2025
World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization.
World Bank. (2016). Live Long and Prosper: Aging in East Asia and Pacific.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 NEW ERA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY SOCIAL RESEARCHES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
